Comments on: Another one. http://www.cudemocrats.com/archives/99 The Pulse of Liberal Activism Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:13:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Anonymous http://www.cudemocrats.com/archives/99/comment-page-1#comment-18 Anonymous Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:46:00 +0000 http://cudemocrats.nfshost.com/cucd/?p=99#comment-18 In other words, you're missing the point about which "principles" are in question. This impeachment was not about whether Bill Clinton's affair was moral or not, but rather whether it is right or wrong to lie under oath. <br/><br/>It's really not that complicated. Any chance you'll offer a retraction? Oh, wait, I can see what's coming next -- "Well, I wasn't referring to the perjury, as much as the idea that he'd have an affair while being some sorta paragon of moral values, like all Republicans try to be." <br/><br/>Riiiiight...like that's what you meant initially. In other words, you’re missing the point about which “principles” are in question. This impeachment was not about whether Bill Clinton’s affair was moral or not, but rather whether it is right or wrong to lie under oath.

It’s really not that complicated. Any chance you’ll offer a retraction? Oh, wait, I can see what’s coming next — “Well, I wasn’t referring to the perjury, as much as the idea that he’d have an affair while being some sorta paragon of moral values, like all Republicans try to be.”

Riiiiight…like that’s what you meant initially.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.cudemocrats.com/archives/99/comment-page-1#comment-17 Anonymous Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:42:00 +0000 http://cudemocrats.nfshost.com/cucd/?p=99#comment-17 I'd hate to lower the level of discourse right off the bat, but you're an idiot. He's saying he's not a hypocrite because he was going after Clinton for perjuring himself. There's nothing hypocritical about that. I’d hate to lower the level of discourse right off the bat, but you’re an idiot. He’s saying he’s not a hypocrite because he was going after Clinton for perjuring himself. There’s nothing hypocritical about that.

]]>